e-Newsletter

 
July, 2002

Welcome to the Whittington & Associates e-Newsletter!
Visit and bookmark our web site today: http://www.WhittingtonAssociates.com

This e-newsletter is in HTML format and may not be displayed properly by some email programs. Please click on our web site address above to see the e-newsletter with its proper formatting.

Note: RAB-certified QMS auditors must complete their transition training to ISO 9001:2000 from an approved provider by 12/15/02. See section 7 for our Auditor Transition classes in Dallas, Reston, Atlanta, Chicago, Charlotte, and San Jose over the next three months.
 
July Articles
Training Spotlight
1. Improve Quality or Reduce Payroll? 

2. Code of Conduct for Internal Auditors

3. New ISO/TS 16949:2002 Auditor Certification 

4. Language Barriers in an Audit 

5. Measurement Systems Analysis 

6. New AS9100 Auditor Certification

7. Class Schedule: July, 2002 - September, 2002

8. Schedule of Quality Events

To see previous articles, go to Newsletter Archives.

Atlanta, Georgia
ISO 9001:2000 Conversion
July 18-19, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor
July 22-26, 2002
September 23-27, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor
August 19-21, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Refresher
August 22-23, 2002

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements
September 19-20, 2002

Reston, Virginia
Implementing ISO 9001:2000
August 12-13, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor
August 14-16, 2002

Training Classes in Other Cities

1. Improve Quality or Reduce Payroll? 

Tough economic times may require hard decisions by management for the survival of the organization. Too often, the first solution seems to be cutting costs by reducing the payroll.

Business results can be very sensitive to minor improvements in performance. For example, the Institute of Directors (IoD) reported in Business Excellence that a 1% boost in efficiency has a typical profit improvement of 1.9%, the same as for a 1% payroll reduction. However, quality programs that reduce costs or waste by 1% typically have a 7.9% increase in profits.

Managers, are you listening? Improved quality should be an integral part of your strategy.
 
2. Code of Conduct for Internal Auditors 

I created this proposed Code of Conduct for internal auditors using the Code of Ethics from the Institute of Internal Auditors and the Code of Conduct for internal auditors certified by the Registrar Accreditation Board.

Audit program managers could ask their internal auditors to sign this code of conduct each year to emphasize the importance of adhering to the principles and ethics of the organization.

Purpose

To communicate the integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, and competence expected of internal auditors, as well as, to provide a means for them to pledge their commitment to these principles.

 Integrity

The integrity of internal auditors establishes trust and provides the basis for relying on their judgment. As an internal auditor, I pledge to:

1. Perform my work with honesty, accuracy, fairness, and responsibility.
2. Not engage in activities that might discredit the audit profession or my organization.

Objectivity

Internal auditors must be objective in gathering, evaluating, and communicating information about the activities being examined. They must make a balanced and impartial assessment of all the relevant facts and not be unduly influenced by their interests, or those of others, in making judgments. As an internal auditor, I pledge to:

3. Not join in any activity or relationship that may affect my unbiased assessment.
4. Not accept anything that may impair, or appear to impair, my judgment.
5. Disclose all the material facts to avoid any distortion of my audit report.

Confidentiality

Internal auditors must respect the value and ownership of the information they receive and not disclose it without the appropriate authority (unless obligated for legal or professional reasons). As an internal auditor, I pledge to:

6. Be prudent in the use and protection of the information acquired during my audit duties.
7. Not use the information for personal gain or in any way detrimental to the organization.

Competence

Internal auditors must apply their knowledge, skills, and experience in the performance of their assessment duties. As an internal auditor, I pledge to:

8. Engage only in audits where I possess the needed knowledge, skills, and experience.
9. Perform audits in accordance with the procedures and practices of my organizations.
10. Continually improve my proficiency and the quality and value of my audit services.
11. Assist other auditors under my supervision to develop their audit management skills.
12. Report any complaints regarding my performance and address them to avoid recurrence.

Signed by:  __________________________

Date:           __________________________
 
3. New ISO/TS 16949:2002 Auditor Certification

To be eligible for certification as an ISO/TS 16949:2002 auditor, candidates must be sponsored by an IATF contracted registrar. The auditor qualification criteria include:

1. ISO 9001:2000 Qualification

  • Qualified per rules of the relevant accreditation body
  • Competency in ISO quality standards and audit management
  • Competency in interview techniques and team techniques
2. Automotive Industry Specific Skills
  • Automotive core tools knowledge and competence
3. Minimum Work Experience
  • ISO 9001:2000 Audit Experience
    • At least three ISO 9001:2000 3rd party audits
    • A minimum of ten audit days
    • At least one audit as the lead auditor
  • New Automotive Auditors
    • Three years full-time automotive experience (OEM, tier 1, or tier 2)
    • Alternative would be industries with equivalent requirements
                  (Chemical, electrical, or metallic commodities)
                  (Must include 2 years dedicated to QA activities)
    • Experience must be completed in the last six years
  • Existing Automotive Auditors
    • At least 15 third-party audits in the automotive sector
    • Audits to AVSQ 94, EAQF 94, QS-9000, VDA 6.1, or ISO/TS 16949:1999
    • Audits must be in last 3 years
    • A minimum of 45 audit days
    • At least two audits as the lead auditor
4. IATF Sanctioned ISO/TS 16949:2002 Training

A three day course is available for auditors previously qualified for ISO/TS 16949:1999. Other auditors must attend the full four-day course. All auditors must successfully complete the sanctioned auditor examination.

Classes are available through the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). You can contact <kdillard@aiag.org> for schedule and enrollment information. Remember, the training is only open to auditors sponsored by an IATF contracted registrar.
 
4. Language Barriers in an Audit

How do you audit a system when some of the employees can only communicate in a language other than your own? And what if they can't read the available work instructions?

According to the ANSI-RAB National Accreditation Program Criteria, the audit team must be able to communicate effectively, both in writing and orally, in the required languages.

The ISO 19011:2002 auditing guidelines say to consider the languages to be used during the audit, as well as, social and cultural aspects, when establishing an audit team. The guidance also says auditors should be able to communicate effectively, either through their personal linguistic skills, or through the support of a competent interpreter.

The IAF Guidance on the Application of ISO Guide 62 states additional auditor time will be necessary if the organization speaks more than one language and an interpreter is required.

So, you should determine in advance if any of the people to be interviewed only speak a language other than that of the audit team. Depending on the extent of the language barrier, you may decide to include an interpreter on the team. Or, you may choose to use a translator provided by the auditee (and accept that risk).

In either case, you should allow extra time for the translation of questions and responses. You should also include in your audit report that the team relied on translation for certain interviews and identify the resulting risk of miscommunication.

However, auditors gather objective evidence by 1) interviewing people, 2) observing activities, 3) reviewing documents, and 4) examining records. You can still assess the area by watching the people perform the work, looking at the available procedures, and analyzing the records.

But what if a work instruction can't be read by some of the operators? Whether they can read it or not, they must carry out their duties in accordance with the documented process.

Of course, if the organization felt the instruction was necessary for their English-speaking employees, I would want someone to explain why it isn't necessary for all the employees. Maybe they provide special training to accommodate the non-English speaking personnel. Perhaps they use flowcharts with process symbols and photographs to minimize the need for text in multiple languages.

Find out how the organization is overcoming the limitations for employees that do not read or speak the language used for the documentation. Determine how process changes are communicated to all the employees.

Different native languages can be an obstacle to an efficient (extra time) and effective (miscommunication) audit. However, with proper planning, support, and questions, the barrier can be overcome.
 
5. Measurement Systems Analysis 

The 3rd edition of the Measurement Systems Analysis reference manual is available from the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). The guidelines document has been rewritten and is nearly double in size.

The first chapter provides General Measurement Systems Guidelines and has sections on terminology, measurements, effects of variability, measurement strategy and planning, gage source selection process, measurement issues, uncertainty, and problem analysis.

The chapter on General Concepts for Assessing Measurement Systems covers selecting and developing test procedures, preparation for a measurement system study, and the analysis of results.

The next chapter on Recommended Practices for Simple Measurement Systems provides guidance on determining stability, bias, linearity, and repeatability and reproducibility. The chapter also covers the range method, average and range method, graphical analysis of results, and attribute measurement systems.

The chapter on Practices for Complex Measurement Systems addresses stability studies and variability studies. The final chapter covers other measurement concepts. The document concludes with appendices, a glossary, a reference list, and sample forms.

The AIAG members can purchase the document for $9.00. Non-members will pay $27.00. Call the AIAG Customer Service department at 248-358-3003 to place an order.
 
6. New AS9100 Auditor Certification 

The Registrar Accreditation Board (RAB) has introduced a new certification program for aerospace auditors. The AS9100 auditor certification was developed in cooperation with the Registrar Management Committee of the Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAOG).

Two certifications will be available for aerospace auditors, depending on experience levels. AS9100 Auditor (AA) candidates must provide evidence they have completed an approved QMS lead auditor course and approved training on the AS9100 standard.

Applicants for Aerospace Experienced Auditor (AEA) must meet the AA requirements, plus one of three options:

1. Appropriate industry work experience
2. IRCA aerospace certification

3. Completion of an approved, in-depth aerospace industry competency course and witness audit experience.

See Aerospace Auditor Certification at the RAB web site to download the program criteria and application forms.
 
7. Class Schedule for July, 2002 - September, 2002

To enroll in any of these public classes, go to the Class Schedule at our web site, or call us at 800-404-7585. The classes taught by Larry Whittington are shown in gold.

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor (ANSI/RAB-NAP Accredited) - CEEM, Inc.
July August September
15-19  Reston, VA 05-09  Orlando, FL 16-20  Reston, VA
22-26  Dallas, TX  12-16  Houston, TX 23-27  Atlanta, GA
22-26  Atlanta, GA 19-23  Reston, VA 23-27  Chicago, IL
29-02  San Jose, CA   - - 30-04  San Jose, CA

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor (ANSI/RAB-NAP Accredited) - CEEM, Inc.
July August September
July 08-10  Reston, VA 14-16  Reston, VA 18-20  Chicago, IL
  - - 19-21  Atlanta, GA   - -

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Transition (RAB-Approved)
* Auditor Refresher (same content as Auditor Transition)
July August September
16-17  Dallas, TX 08-09  Reston, VA 12-13  Chicago, IL
  - - 22-23  Atlanta, GA (*) 23-24  Charlotte, NC
  - - 26-27  San Diego, CA   - -

Implementing ISO 9001:2000 (for New Systems)
July August September
18-19  Dallas, TX 12-13  Reston, VA 16-17  Chicago, IL

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements
July August September
  - -   - - 19-20  Atlanta, GA

ISO 9001:2000 Conversion (for Existing Systems)
Note (*): Special two-day version of our three-day Conversion course.
July August September
18-19  Atlanta, GA (*) 07-09  Houston, TX 11-13  Reston, VA
  - - 28-30  San Diego, CA 25-27  Charlotte, NC

Quality System Documentation (Revised for ISO 9001:2000)
July August September
11-12  Reston, VA   - -   - -

To arrange an economical on-site class, please call us at 800-404-7585.
 
8. Schedule of Quality Events

Conference On Quality In Commercial Aviation
September 22-25, 2002 in Dallas, TX

11th Annual Service Quality Conference
September 23-24, 2002 in Las Vegas, NV

QuEST Forum Best Practices Conference
September 24-25, 2002 in Dallas, TX

10th National Quality Education Conference
September 28 - October 1, 2002 in  Columbus, OH

World Quality Congress
September 29 - October 2, 2002 in Harrogate, United Kingdom

22nd Southeastern Quality Conference
October 21-22, 2002 in Atlanta, GA

(Larry Whittington will speak on ISO 19011:2002)

APICS International Conference and Exposition
October 27-30, 2002 in Nashville, TN

12th International Conference on Software Quality
October 28-30, 2002 in Ottawa, Canada

Society for Advancement of Material and Process Engineering
34th International Technical Conference
November 4-7, 2002 in Baltimore, MD

Customer-Supplier Division Conference
November 5-6, 2002 in Louisville, KY

ASQ's 3rd Six Sigma Conference
January 27-28, 2003 in Palm Springs, CA

ASQ Quality Audit Division Conference
February 6-7, 2003 in Reno, Nevada

ASQ Quality Management Division Conference
March 12-14, 2003 in Phoenix, AZ

25th International Conference on Software Engineering
May 3-10, 2003 in Portland, OR

57th Annual ASQ Quality Congress
May 19-21, 2003 in Kansas City, MO


© 2000-2002 Whittington & Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.
You may copy this e-Newsletter provided you copy it completely, do not change it, and include this copyright notice.

-top-

Site by Frogtown Media Web Design

Send this page to a friend