e-Newsletter

 
August, 2002

Welcome to the Whittington & Associates e-Newsletter!
Visit and bookmark our web site today: http://www.WhittingtonAssociates.com

This e-newsletter is in HTML format and may not be displayed properly by some email programs. Please click on our web site address above to see the e-newsletter with its proper formatting.

Note: RAB-certified QMS auditors must complete their transition training to ISO 9001:2000 from an approved provider by 12/15/02. See section 7 for our Auditor Transition classes in Reston, Atlanta, San Diego, Chicago, Charlotte, and San Jose over the next three months.



* * Reduced fee of $650 for Auditor Transition class in Atlanta (Auditor Refresher) on August 22-23 * *

August Articles
Training Spotlight
1. Word Power for Quality Documents

2. EPA Promotes Use of ISO 14001

3. New QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations 

4. Southeastern Quality Conference 

5. Fitness-for-Use a Liability Exposure? 

6. More Auditor Days for ISO/TS 16949:2002

7. Class Schedule: August, 2002 - October, 2002

8. Schedule of Quality Events

To see previous articles, go to Newsletter Archives.

Atlanta, Georgia

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor
September 23-27, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor
August 19-21, 2002
October 23-25, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Refresher
August 22-23, 2002
October 17-18, 2002

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements
September 19-20, 2002

Reston, Virginia
Implementing ISO 9001:2000
August 12-13, 2002

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor
August 14-16, 2002

Training Classes in Other Cities

1. Word Power for Quality Documents 

Are you using the full power of Microsoft Word in your quality documentation activities? I find many students in my Quality System Documentation classes are unaware of one or more of the following Word functions:

1. Review Comments

If you have been asked to review a draft document, don't return your comments in an email note. There is a much easier way to provide your comments to the author. Use the Comment feature of Word to annotate the electronic copy of the document.

Select the text for your comment and click on Comment in the Insert menu. Enter your comments for that text in the provided window. Click the Close button to return to the document.

Your comments will be identified with your name and become part of the comment log for the document. Any text with "comments" will be highlighted in the document. When the cursor is over that area, the comments appear in a box next to the highlighted text. This view allows the author to see the text and your comments on the same screen.

Note: To set up your name and initials for the review comments, click Options in the Tools menu. Then click the User Information tab and type your name and initials in the Name and Initials boxes.

2. Hidden Text

A document template can include hidden text to instruct authors on how to write each section. These instructions will not print in the actual document. To create hidden text, select the text to be hidden. Click on Font in the Format menu and check the Hidden box under Effects.

To view hidden text, click Options in the Tools menu, click the View tab, and check the Hidden box under Nonprinting Characters. The hidden text will be shown as text with underlined dashes in the displayed document.

To omit hidden text in a printed document, click Options in the Tools menu, click the Print tab, and clear the Hidden Text check box under Include With Document. If you plan to distribute the document online, just delete the hidden text as you would any other text.

3. Grammar and Readability

Although aware of spell checking, authors may not be aware that Word can also analyze document grammar and readability. Click on Options in the Tools menu and select the Spelling and Grammar tab. Select the Check Grammar With Spelling box and the Show Readability Statistics box. When Word finishes checking spelling and grammar, it will display information about the reading level of the document.

The grammar function can verify subject-verb agreement, check for extra spaces, and identify any missing punctuation or capitalization. It will also spot passive sentences (e.g., the document is approved by the manager) that should be rewritten as active sentences (e.g., the manager approves the document).

The document statistics include a Reading Ease index and a reading Grade Level. Both readability scores are based on the average number of syllables per word and words per sentence.

The Reading Ease score rates text on a 100-point scale; the higher the score, the easier it is to understand the document. For most documents, aim for a score of approximately 60 to 70.

The Grade Level score rates text on a grade-school level. For example, a score of 8.0 means that an eighth grader can understand the document. For most documents, aim for a score of approximately 7.0 to 8.0.

4. Watermark

A student in one of my documentation classes was purchasing special "Draft" watermark paper because she wasn't aware of the Word support for it. A watermark is inserted into a document header or footer. The watermark is printed wherever you place it on the page. It doesn't have to be confined to the area at the top or bottom of the page.

Click on Header and Footer in the View menu. Insert the text, such as "Draft," by clicking the Text Box in the Insert menu and typing the watermark you want to appear on every page. You can size the text box by dragging the sizing handles.

To format the text in the text box, select it, click Font in the Format menu, and select the appropriate options. To rotate the text, click Text Direction on the Format menu and select the desired rotation option. Because the text box is a drawing object, you can use options on the Drawing toolbar to format its borders and background color.

To view a watermark as it will appear on the printed page, close the Header and Footer view and switch to Page Layout view or Print Preview. If the watermark interferes with the legibility of the text on the page, you can lighten the text by using the Font command on the Format menu to choose another color, such as light gray.

5. Table of Contents

Many authors create a table of contents for their quality manual by entering the section titles and page numbers in a manually created TOC page. When the sections and page numbers are changed by document revisions. the author has to remember to adjust the table of contents. Word will automatically create and maintain a table of contents and simplify this task.

To create a TOC, you first apply the built-in heading styles (Heading 1 through Heading 9) to the document headings you want to include in the table of contents. The Style box is on the Formatting toolbar. Once you've applied the heading styles, you can choose a design and build the finished table of contents.

To set up the TOC, place the cursor at the desired TOC location in the document and click on Index and Tables in the Insert menu. Then click on the Table of Contents tab and select the TOC format and the desired number of heading levels to be displayed.

When you build a TOC, Word searches for headings with the specified styles, sorts them by heading level, references their page numbers, and displays the table of contents in the document. The TOC can be modified by clicking within the table of contents and then pressing F9.

Once you build a table of contents, you can use it to quickly navigate an online document. Just click any page number in the table of contents to jump to the corresponding heading in the document.

6. Tracking Changes

To track changes while you edit a document, click Track Changes on the Reviewing toolbar. If the Reviewing toolbar is not displayed, click on Toolbars in the View menu and check the Reviewing toolbar box.

Make the changes you want to the text and its formatting. Word uses revision marks to show where a deletion, insertion, or other editing change has been made in a document.

Word can track changes in one of two ways: by marking the revisions as you make them, or by marking the revisions later when it compares two document versions. To specify whether Word should show tracked changes and how you want the inserted, deleted, and changed text to appear, click Options in the Tools menu and click on the Track Changes tab.

You can change the way revision marks look and work in a document by changing the marks and their colors. For example, inserted text could be underlined and deleted text marked by a strikethrough. To add review comments, see the Review Comments section of this article.
 
2. EPA Promotes Use of ISO 14001 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a Position Statement on Environmental Management Systems (EMS). The statement promotes broader use of the systems, which are described as effective management tools to help companies and other organizations fulfill their environmental responsibilities.

The use of an EMS complements needed regulatory controls and enables a facility to comprehensively manage the environmental footprint of its entire operation. This includes unregulated aspects such as energy, water use, climate change, odor, noise, dust, and habitat preservation. It encourages pollution prevention through source reduction and fosters continuous improvement of the facility's environmental performance.

EMS are viewed as a valuable tool for accomplishing EPA's mission, because they apply a multi-media approach, help facilities assure compliance, and promote cost savings, operational efficiency, and improved supplier performance.

The EPA will encourage the use of recognized environmental management frameworks, such as the ISO 14001 standard, as a basis for designing and implementing EMS that aim to achieve outcomes aligned with the nation's environmental policy goals and the principles of this position statement.

The EPA commits to leading by example. The agency will implement EMS in its own facilities and operations, while encouraging widespread use of EMS across other institutions and organizations. The agency is also working with state and local governments to promote EMS. In addition, the agency will support training and research on the costs and benefits of the systems.
 
3. New QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations 

The International Automotive Sector Group (IASG) issued new QS-9000 Sanctioned Interpretations on May 28, 2002 that became effective on July 1, 2002. A new interpretation was added on Requirements and another regarding Registration.

Entry C10 was added on Ford Motor Company specific requirements. Unless waived in writing by Ford for a supplier site, third party registration to QS-9000 or ISO/TS 16949 is required to meet the "capable quality management system" element of Q1 2002. In the past, Q1 did not require registration. Q1 2002 became effective February 1, 2002 and requires registration for production suppliers in North America and Europe.

Ford also states their QOS Assessment Guideline (specified in QS-9000 Specific Requirements) does not identify suitable metrics. Some QOS metrics are given by the Manufacturing Site Assessment of Q1 2002, available at: <https://web.bli.ford.com>.

Ford tier 1 suppliers are authorized to use the Manufacturing Site Assessment  for sub-supplier evaluations. See the C9 interpretation for clause 4.6.2.1 on Supplier Development and the Ford letter of authorization at: <https://web.bli.ford.com>.

Entry R8 was added on the expiration of ISO 9001:1994 and ISO 9002:1994 on December 15, 2003. Any new or renewed QS-9000 certificates must not reference either of those standards, except to state either:

  • Registered to QS-9000:1998 (Based on and including ISO 9001:1994), or
  • Registered to QS-9000:1998 (Based on and including ISO 9002:1994).
All QS-9000 certificates with dates beyond December 15, 2003 must comply with this wording by December 15, 2003. In other words, QS-9000 registered systems will conform to ISO 9001:1994 or ISO 9002:1994 requirements, but systems will be registered to QS-9000, not ISO 9001 or ISO 9002.

If your organization needs to retain dual registration to QS-9000 and ISO 9000, then you will need to obtain a separate, interim registration to ISO 9001:2000, or switch from QS-9000 to ISO/TS 16949:2002 (which QS-9000 systems must do by December 14, 2006).

QS-9000 certificates must not show an ending date later than December 14, 2006. This also applies to the QS-9000 Tooling & Equipment  and Semi-conductor supplements. QS-9000 certificates cannot reference ISO 9001:2000, since it requires a separate certification.

These interpretations are a binding extension of QS-9000:1998 and can be accessed at <http://qs9000.asq.org/sancl.html>.
 
4. Southeastern Quality Conference 

The theme for the 22nd Annual Southeastern Quality Conference is "Quality Through Technology". The conference will be held at the Cobb Galleria Centre on October 21-22, 2002 in Atlanta, Georgia.

The Southeastern Quality Conference is sponsored by the Greater Atlanta Section of the American Society for Quality, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, the Institute of Industrial Engineers, and the Programs in Quality Assurance and Industrial Engineering at Southern Polytechnic State University.

You can select from 30 speakers in multiple tracks for only $275 (if you register before September 9). This is a great value and includes lunch on both days. Larry Whittington will be one of the presenters and discuss the new ISO 19011 auditing guidelines.

Please contact Larry Aft at 404-786-1541 or < laft@bellsouth.net> to register for the conference. You can download a copy of the conference brochure from <http://www.asqatlanta.org>. A map for the conference facility can be viewed at <http://www.cobbgalleria.com/local_area/map/map.html>.
 
5. Fitness-for-Use a Liability Exposure? 

If your organization is not responsible for design, then it can exclude ISO 9001:2000 clause 7.3 from its system. Of course, this exclusion must be identified and justified in the quality manual.

If your customer is fully design-responsible, then your organization's role in product development will be very limited, or even non-existent. So, if you've excluded clause 7.3, how will your organization ensure product fitness-for-use as required by clause 7.2.1.b?

Clause 7.2.1.b states an organization must determine any requirements not stated by the customer, but necessary for the specific or intended use, where known. If not excluded, this clause will place a burden on the manufacturer to ensure fitness-for-use, even if it had no involvement in the design and development process.

Determining fitness-for-use requirements should be part of the design and development process. If your organization is not involved in this customer process, does clause 7.2.1.b really apply to your system? Perhaps you should consider excluding clauses 7.3 and 7.2.1b as a related set of requirements.

Note: This entry was based on an article by James Kolka in the June issue of The Informed Outlook.
 
6. More Auditor Days for ISO/TS 16949:2002

Moving from QS-9000:1998 to ISO/TS 16949:2002 may involve more than conforming to new and changed requirements. Your organization may be subject to additional on-site auditor days under ISO/TS 16949:2002.

Audit Days

The number of on-site auditor days for the initial audit, and the first two years of surveillance visits, have not changed from QS-9000:1998 to ISO 16949:2002. However, most organizations will require more days in Year 3 for the ISO/TS 16949:2002 re-certification audit.
 
Number
of

Employees
Initial Audit On-site Days
QS-9000:1998

ISO /TS 16949:2002
On-site Auditor Days
QS-9000 (each year)

ISO/TS 16949 (Year 1 and 2)
On-site Auditor Days
ISO/TS 16949:2002

Re-certification Audit (Year 3)
1-15 2 2 2
16-30 4 2 2
31-60 5 3 3
61-100 6 3 4
101-250 8 4 5
251-500 10 5 7
501-1000 12 6 8
1001-2000 15 7 10
2001-4000 18 9 12
4001- up 21 11 14

Multiple Sites

Appendix H in QS-9000 provides for a reduction in on-site auditor days for multiple sites under a single certificate (Corporate Audit Scheme). However, the Auditor Day Adjustment Table is not included in ISO/TS 16949:2002. Instead, it has been placed in Annex 3 of the IATF Rules for Certification Bodies to ISO/TS 16949:2002.

Notice below that the new reductions may result in more auditor days being scheduled. Check with your registrar to see if your registration budget will be affected due to additional on-site auditor days.
 
Number of Sites QS-9000: Reduction To ISO/TS 16949: Reduction To
2-9 70% 80%
10-19 60% 70%
20 and above 50% 60%
7. Class Schedule for August, 2002 - October, 2002

To enroll in any of these public classes, go to the Class Schedule at our web site, or call us at 800-404-7585. The classes taught by Larry Whittington are shown in gold.

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor (ANSI/RAB-NAP Accredited) - CEEM, Inc.
August September October
05-09  Orlando, FL 16-20  Reston, VA 07-11  Reston, VA
12-16  Houston, TX 23-27  Atlanta, GA 21-25  San Antonio, TX
19-23  Reston, VA 23-27  Chicago, IL 28-01  San Diego, CA
  - - 30-04  San Jose, CA   - -

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor (ANSI/RAB-NAP Accredited) - CEEM, Inc.
August September October
14-16  Reston, VA 18-20  Chicago, IL 07-09  San Jose, CA
19-21  Atlanta, GA   - - 23-25  Atlanta, GA

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Transition (RAB-Approved)
* Auditor Refresher (same content as Auditor Transition)
August September October
08-09  Reston, VA 12-13  Chicago, IL 10-11  San Jose, CA
22-23  Atlanta, GA (*) 23-24  Charlotte, NC 17-18  Atlanta, GA (*)
26-27  San Diego, CA  - -   - - 

Implementing ISO 9001:2000 (for New Systems)
August September October
12-13  Reston, VA 16-17  Chicago, IL 22-23  Reston, VA

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements
August September October
  - - 19-20  Atlanta, GA   - -

ISO 9001:2000 Conversion (for Existing Systems)
August September October
07-09  Houston, TX 11-13  Reston, VA 16-18  San Antonio, TX
28-30  San Diego, CA 25-27  Charlotte, NC  - -

Quality System Documentation (Revised for ISO 9001:2000)
August September October
  - -   - - 24-25  Reston, VA

To arrange an economical on-site class, please call us at 800-404-7585.
 
8. Schedule of Quality Events

Conference On Quality In Commercial Aviation
September 22-25, 2002 in Dallas, TX

11th Annual Service Quality Conference
September 23-24, 2002 in Las Vegas, NV

QuEST Forum Best Practices Conference
September 24-25, 2002 in Dallas, TX

10th National Quality Education Conference
September 28 - October 1, 2002 in  Columbus, OH

World Quality Congress
September 29 - October 2, 2002 in Harrogate, United Kingdom

22nd Southeastern Quality Conference
October 21-22, 2002 in Atlanta, GA

(Larry Whittington will speak on ISO 19011:2002)

APICS International Conference and Exposition
October 27-30, 2002 in Nashville, TN

12th International Conference on Software Quality
October 28-30, 2002 in Ottawa, Canada

Society for Advancement of Material and Process Engineering
34th International Technical Conference
November 4-7, 2002 in Baltimore, MD

Customer-Supplier Division Conference
November 5-6, 2002 in Louisville, KY

ASQ's 3rd Six Sigma Conference
January 27-28, 2003 in Palm Springs, CA

ASQ Quality Audit Division Conference
February 6-7, 2003 in Reno, Nevada

ASQ Quality Management Division Conference
March 12-14, 2003 in Phoenix, AZ

25th International Conference on Software Engineering
May 3-10, 2003 in Portland, OR

57th Annual ASQ Quality Congress
May 19-21, 2003 in Kansas City, MO


© 2000-2002 Whittington & Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.
You may copy this e-Newsletter provided you copy it completely, do not change it, and include this copyright notice.

-top-

Site by Frogtown Media Web Design

Send this page to a friend