e-Newsletter

 
March, 2004

Welcome to the Whittington & Associates e-Newsletter! Visit and bookmark our web site today: http://www.WhittingtonAssociates.com

This e-Newsletter is in HTML format and may not be displayed properly by some email programs. Please click on our web site address above to see the e-Newsletter with its proper formatting.
 
March Articles
Training in Atlanta


Click on a title to jump to the article:

1. Feedback Needed on ISO 9001 and ISO 9004

2. Commerce Issues Manufacturing Strategy

3. Internal Audits of Regulatory Requirements

4. ISO 9001:2000 Guidelines for Education Sector

5. Registration versus Certification

6. English One-Ohhhh-One

7. Class Schedule: March, 2004 - May, 2004


To see previous articles, go to Newsletter Archives.


Note: Students that have attended a class in Atlanta receive a 20% discount on futureAtlanta classes.

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Update
March 26, 2004; July 23, 2004

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor
April 26-30, 2004

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor
March 23-25, 2004; May 25-27, 2004

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements
May 10, 2004

Quality System Documentation
May 11-12, 2004

Implementing ISO 9001:2000
May 13-14, 2004

Green Belt Certification
March 22-24, 2004
April 28-30, 2004
May 24-26, 2004

Black Belt Certification (3 weeks)
Group 10: 3/29-4/2/04; 5/3-7/04; 6/7-11/04

Training Classes in Other Cities

1. Feedback Needed on ISO 9001 and ISO 9004

Now is the time for US organizations to register their experiences, comments, and concerns on the use of ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000. It is critical that ISO gets feedback on actual user experiences on the application of these two standards.

ISO Technical Committee 176, Sub-committee 2, Quality Systems, has asked for international participation in a survey of user experience with ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000.  A website questionnaire has been designed to identify your concerns and recommendations with regard to the suitability and application of these standards. Your survey response will provide direct input to the future revisions of ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000.
 
Since US organizations will be providing feedback along with other ISO member countries, it is essential that our experience with the use of these standards be recorded so that US interests are represented and protected. To be included, your comments must be submitted through the ISO survey located at:
http://isotc.iso.ch/webquest/tc176/index.html
 
It should only take about 15 minutes to complete the survey. Anyone with some knowledge or experience with the standards may participate. Where you indicate concerns, participants will be prompted to suggest improved wording of the clauses (if interested).
 
Since there is no limit to the number of people who may respond from any one organization, it is imperative that actual US users of the standards take the time to participate in order that all US experiences are adequately represented in the evaluation. Your participation is vital and your feedback goes directly to ISO!
 
When the survey is completed, the results of the survey will be widely disseminated, e.g., through the ISO/TC 176/SC 2 web site at www.bsi.org.uk/ios-tx176-sc2.  The results of the survey will play a major role in guiding the revisions of these standards.


2. Commerce Issues Manufacturing Strategy

Manufacturing is a cornerstone of the American economy. The United States is the world’s largest producer of manufactured goods and leads the world in innovation. Simply put, manufacturing matters -- to jobs, rising productivity, and higher standards of living. Manufacturers improve our quality of life.

To help identify the challenges facing our manufacturing sector, the Department of Commerce held many public roundtables over the past year. These discussions included representatives from small, medium, and large companies from a broad range of industries, including auto parts, aerospace, biotechnology, and semiconductors. Through this dialogue, they heard the challenges facing US manufacturers. The feedback from manufacturers fell within the following six categories:
1. Focusing On Manufacturing and Its Competitiveness
2. Generating Stronger Economic Growth Domestically and Internationally
3. Reducing Costs That Erode Competitiveness
4. Reinforcing America’s Technological Leadership
5. Ensuring A Highly Skilled and Educated Workforce
6. Insisting On A Level International Playing Field
Their report included recommendations for each of these six areas. For example, the recommendations for "Strengthening Education, Retraining, and Economic Diversification" are:
  • Establish a High School and Technical Education Partnership Initiative. Ensure that students are being taught the necessary skills to make successful transitions from high school to college, and from college to the workforce.
  • Analyze Specialized Training Needed to Succeed in the Manufacturing Environment of the Future. Examine whether the existing system of vocational-technical education is sufficient to meet the needs of the manufacturing sector and propose recommendations for improvement.
  • Establish Personal Re-employment Accounts. Help ensure that workers who lose their jobs can rapidly and successfully reenter the workforce.
  • Coordinate Economic Adjustment for Manufacturing Communities. Coordinate the efforts of federal agencies in addressing structural economic challenges faced by manufacturing-dependent communities in transition.
  • Transform Workforce Development Programs. Enable workers to develop skills necessary for employment in emerging and growing industries.
To see the full 88 page report, go to: <http://www.commerce.gov/DOC_MFG_Report_Complete.pdf>.

3. Internal Audits of Regulatory Requirements  

How should internal auditors determine if their organization is conforming to regulatory requirements? Before answering this question, lets review the references to "regulatory" requirements in ISO 9001:2000:     

0.1, Introduction - General: This International Standard can be used ... to assess the organization's ability to meet customer, regulatory, and the organization's own requirements.

1.1, Scope - General: This International Standard specifies requirements for a quality management system where an organization ... b) aims to enhance customer satisfaction through ... and the assurance of conformity to customer and applicable regulatory requirements. 

1.2, Application: Where exclusions are made, claims of conformity to this International Standard are not acceptable, unless ... and such exclusions do not affect the organization's ability, or responsibility, to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements.

5.1, Management Responsibility - Management Commitment: Top management shall provide evidence of its commitment ... by: a) communicating to the organization the importance of meeting customer, as well as, statutory and regulatory requirements, ... 

7.2.1, Determination of Requirements Related to the Product: The organization shall determine ... c) statutory and regulatory requirements related to the product, and ...

7.3.2, Design and Development Inputs: These inputs shall include ... b) applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, ...

What is the difference between "statutory" and "regulatory" requirements? A statute is a law enacted by the legislative branch of a government. A regulation is a rule or order issued by an executive authority or regulatory agency of a government that has the force of law.

If audits evaluate the conformity of a quality management system to the requirements of ISO 9001:2000, then clauses 5.1.a, 7.2.1.c, and 7.3.2.b indicate audits must also address statutory and regulatory requirements.

Among the regulation sources are the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OHSA), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Requirement examples are: Safety-related, e.g., Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Environment-related, e.g., recycling permits for waste oil; and Medical-related, e.g., Quality System Regulation -Title 21 part 820 - Code of Federal Regulations.

Legal requirements are extremely important. If they are violated, your products could be recalled, fines levied, facilities closed, and criminal penalties imposed. Unfortunately, many auditors are unaware of these legal requirements. They may be the most important requirements to be met, yet many internal audits ignore them.

However, someone must know about these requirements, because clause 7.2.1.c requires the organization to determine them. Auditors must ask the appropriate people, "What regulatory requirements are applicable to our products and organization?"  And, it all begins with management, since clause 5.1.a states top management must communicate the importance of meeting these legal requirements.

Remember, we're not just talking about federal regulations. There may also be state or local regulations that apply to your products. If your organization is involved with international business, there will be foreign laws and regulations to consider, as well as, the permits and clearances needed to import and export products.

Auditors should identify the statutory and regulatory requirements that are recognized by the organization. Then, find out how these requirements are addressed by the quality management system.


4. ISO 9001:2000 Guidelines for Education Sector

ISO has published new guidelines for organizations in the education sector wishing to benefit from the implementation of ISO 9001:2000. The guidelines are intended for organizations at all levels, providing all types of education: elementary, medium and higher; special and adult education; and distance and e-learning.

ISO/IWA 2: Quality management systems - Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2000 in education, contains the full text of ISO 9001:2000, clause-by-clause, followed by specific text making the standard easier to understand and implement by the education sector. In addition, IWA 2 includes the full text of ISO 9004:2000, which gives organizations guidelines for achieving further benefits from their quality management systems through the pursuit of continual performance improvement.

The IWA 2 guidelines do not add to, change, or modify the requirements of ISO 9001:2000. It is not intended that organizations be certified to the document. However, IWA 2 can be used to assess the organization's ability to meet customer, regulatory, and its own quality requirements. As a result, it will be useful to both internal and external parties (including registrars) when the user organization is seeking ISO 9001:2000 registration.

IWA 2 is ISO's second International Workshop Agreement (IWA 1 provided guidelines for process improvements in health service organizations). An IWA is one of several ISO alternatives to International Standards where swift development and publication takes priority. Compared to the usual ISO process of developing International Standards through its technical committee structure, the IWA is developed in open workshops and organized by a national standards institute.

IWA 1 is available from ASQ, so I expect that you will be able to order IWA 2 soon at <http://qualitypress.asq.org>.

5. Registration versus Certification

Several readers questioned my use of "certification" in an article last month about publicizing an ISO 9001:2000 certificate. They felt the term should have been "registration". My article was based on an official ISO press release dated 12/15/03.

Please see:  http://www.iso.org/iso/en/commcentre/pressreleases/2003/Ref883.html

ISO Guide 2 says "certification" is the procedure by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process, or service conforms to specific requirements.

Certifying bodies (called registrars in the USA) certify an organization as conforming to ISO 9001:2000 and issue a certificate. This certificate covering the scope of "registration" and the organization's name is placed in a public registry. In the USA, "registration" is the preferred term for quality management systems to avoid any confusion with the certification of products.

Many of our subscribers are outside the USA, so I kept the terminology used in the ISO press release. Our two-day Implementing ISO 9001:2000 course states in part, "The logo cannot be cropped or edited and must not be used in relationship to your products (since it is a system registration, not a product certification)".

I should have placed a note at the bottom of the article to clarify the terminology differences for my USA readers. Thanks for your feedback.


6. English One-Ohhhh-One

We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes,
But the plural of ox became oxen, not oxes.

One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,
Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice,
Yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men,
Why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?

If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet,
And I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?

If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
Why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?

Then one may be that, and three would be those,
Yet hat in the plural would never be hose,
And the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
But though we say mother, we never say methren.

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his, and him,
But imagine the feminine, she, shis, and shim.

Source: AAA Going Places: November – December 2002

7. Class Schedule for March, 2004 - May, 2004

To enroll in these public classes, go to Class Schedule at our web site, or call us at 800-404-7585. The classes taught by Larry Whittington are shown in gold.

ISO 9001:2000 Lead Auditor (RAB Accredited) - BSI Management Systems
Initial course version developed by Larry Whittington 
March April May
08-12  Orange County, CA 19-23  Reston, VA 03-07  Phoenix, AZ
15-19  Charlotte, NC 26-30  Atlanta, GA 10-14  Pittsburgh, PA
22-26  Kansas City, MO 26-30  San Diego, CA 17-21  Detroit, MI
29-02  San Jose, CA   - - 17-21  Houston, TX

  - - 24-28  San Diego, CA

ISO 9001:2000 Internal Auditor (RAB Accredited) - BSI Management Systems
March April
May
22-24  Charlotte, NC 21-23  Reston, VA
19-21  San Diego, CA
23-25  Atlanta, GA    - -
25-27  Atlanta, GA

ISO 9001:2000 Auditor Update - The Process Approach - Course developed by Larry Whittington
March
July September
26  Atlanta, GA 23  Atlanta, GA 20  Atlanta, GA

Implementing ISO 9001:2000 - Course developed by Larry Whittington
March April May
08-09  Orange County, CA 19-20  San Diego, CA 06-07  Pittsburgh, PA
  - -   - - 13-14  Atlanta, GA

Understanding ISO 9001:2000
March May
12  Kansas City, MO 18  San Diego, CA

Understanding ISO 9001:2000 Requirements (Atlanta Only - $295) - Course developed by Larry Whittington
May September
10  Atlanta, GA 13  Atlanta, GA

Quality System Documentation (ISO 9001:2000) - Course developed by Larry Whittington
March April May
16-17  Detroit, MI 15-16  Reston, VA 11-12  Atlanta, GA

The above public courses can be offered on-site at your facility. In addition, we offer these on-site courses:

  • Understanding ISO/TS 16949:2002 Requirements (1 day) - Course developed by Larry Whittington
  • Internal Quality Auditing (2 Days) - Course developed by Larry Whittington (based on ISO 19011)

To arrange an economical on-site class, please call us at 800-404-7585.


© 2000-2004 Whittington & Associates, LLC. All rights reserved.
You may copy this e-Newsletter provided you copy it completely, do not change it, and include this copyright notice.

-top-

Site by Frogtown Media Web Design

Send this page to a friend